Sections

Sold! City buys CitiStorage for $160M, can finally finish Bushwick Inlet Park

Up in lights: At one point, park activists projected messages on the side of the CitiStorage complex noting that it was supposed to be parkland. Now it will be.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Put it in park!

Mayor DeBlasio has reached a $160-million deal to buy the final stretch of Williamsburg waterfront land the city needs to finish Bushwick Inlet Park, finally ending locals’ years-long fight to force it to honor a decade-old promise to transform the lot into a sprawling green space.

“We’re stunned but ecstatic,” said Greenpoint resident Steve Chesler, of activist group Friends of Bushwick Inlet Park. “We’re very happy the properties are in safe hands with the city and the taxpayers and now we can move forward.”

Williamsburg developer Norm Brodsky rejected a $100-million offer from the city to buy his burnt-out CitiStorage warehouses at Kent Avenue and N. 11th Street in June, but the various parties quietly continued negotiating, Chesler says.

Brodsky had bragged that he could score upwards of $300 million for the industrial land — and claims he had two other, higher offers on the table — but says he was willing to sell it to DeBlasio for less so long as the city came a little closer to what he believed is the true value of the land.

As a longtime local, he too wanted to see the city make good on finishing the park that it first pledged to build in 2005 in exchange for rezoning the neighborhood for luxury high-rises, he says — just not without getting a cut.

“The city was always my first choice — I’ve been in the neighborhood for years,” said Brodsky. “But the city had to come a lot closer to the value than what it did initially.”

Still, the sale probably never would have happened if it weren’t for Assemblyman Joe Lentol (D–Greenpoint) and especially Councilman Steve Levin (D–Williamsbu­rg), who just didn’t let it rest, both Chesler and Brodsky say.

The pols were the go-between for the two parties, keeping negotiations alive until the deal was done, according to Lentol.

“It wasn’t your classic negotiation of a deal — it was more like elected officials being runners from City Hall to Norm Brodsky and back again, trying to run interferen­ce,” Lentol said.

The city has already bought up 17 acres of the 28 acres needed for the entire park, but had long claimed it couldn’t afford Brodksy’s 11-acre site — right in the middle of the planned green space — as land values, ironically, have skyrocketed since the 2005 rezoning.

As recently as 2015, Mayor DeBlasio had no plans to purchase the final piece of the puzzle, but the activists and local pols fought a long and high-profile campaign to force Hizzoner to change his mind.

The local rabble-rousers came up with particularly creative ways to keep their cause in the news — holding a rally on a flotilla of kayaks, projecting messages onto the warehouses, creating a pop-up park on the land, and camping out in front of the site.

And Lentol was pursuing state legislation to seize the property via eminent domain, while Levin had vowed to withhold his crucial support for ever rezoning the CitiStorage lot for residential use, which greatly reduced its value.

It will still be a long time before Bushwick Inlet Park is actually done — the city needs to demolish the warehouses and old oil refineries currently occupying the space, then scrub the soil of toxic waste — but locals say they’re just happy to know the land is secure.

“This is not going to happen tomorrow — a lot of us will be old and gray, and I already am old and gray,” said Lentol, who is 73 and sports a snowy white head of hair.

Reach deputy editor Ruth Brown at rbrown@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260–8309. Follow her at twitter.com/rbbrown.
Posted 3:04 pm, November 22, 2016
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reasonable discourse

Jeffrey from Williamsburg says:
Here's Brodsky's motivation, http://therealdeal.com/2016/11/22/trumps-infrastructure-plans-may-drive-sell-off-of-government-bonds-fears-of-interest-rate-hikes/
Nov. 22, 2016, 4:45 pm
Mom from Clinton Hill says:
Ironically, prices for burnt-out properties on toxic soil have skyrocketed since 2005, making them the perfect place for future generations to play. Who needs Trump?
Nov. 22, 2016, 10:41 pm
schaz from Greenpoint says:
FINALLY -- a mention of North Brookyn in the Brooklyn Paper.
Even your crime stats (for "all" the Brooklyn precincts) ignore the Greenpoint/Williamsburg 94th precinct.
Hey guys (and gals), we're part of Brooklyn too!
Nov. 23, 2016, 1:24 pm
Ivanka from Manhattan says:
Glad to have helped on this project for the little people of Brooklyn.
Nov. 23, 2016, 5:33 pm
Holly Woobles from Williamsburg says:
They are ripping the owner off! This is worth as much as ten times what they paid! Perhaps five billion dollars. When is the city going to pay them this money?!?!
Nov. 24, 2016, 9:22 am
Donnie from Williamsburg says:
That whole area is going to be underwater in 15-20 years, including mccarren park. If you don't live on a top hill street you'd be wise to get out while you can. 2016 was the hottest year ever since we started keeping records and Iceland, the Antarctic is melting at an unexpected accelerated rate. The methane trapped underneath from archaic vegetation, organisms is being released causing a snowball effect that can never be reversed. It's ironic that all these yuppies wear capris and high waters, cause when the water rises they'll be the first to pack up their brats and skidattle. Wake up sheeple! This is what the higher ups already know.
Nov. 24, 2016, 3:40 pm
Lucy from Bushwick says:
Donnie - you said it! These yuppies and their high water capris are so dumb! Iceland is melting people! The stinky methane is there, under the ice! The city should be building a giant airconditioner, to keep the world cool. Not a park!
Nov. 25, 2016, 4:19 am
David Weinkrantz from Downtown Brooklyn says:
When and how did Mayor DeBlasio obtain authority to spend $160,000,000 of City funds to buy the land?

Did a councilperson sponsor a bill in the City Counsel authorizing the expenditure of the funds? Did the full Council vote on it? Who voted for and who voted against? Is there now $160,000,000 fewer dollars left to pay for city services?
Nov. 25, 2016, 4:12 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.